Wednesday, December 16, 2009

God And Country

"Heavenly Patriots"

"Now therefore ye are no more strangers and foreigners, but fellowcitizens with the saints, and of the household of God;" (Ephesians 2:19)

What if we Christians treated God, like we do our country?

1) In Service: We would teach their children that it's an honor to give their life for the "cause" of God.
From our youth up, we're taught how great the military is, for it's discipline, adventure, bravery (and lifetime benefits). And how honourable it is, to die for your own nation. Yea, few people are honoured more in America, than her fallen soldiers.
Yet, how many Christian children are taught to love the service of the Lord, or exhorted to enter into full time service for Him. How many would dare be willing to give up part of their lifetime, much less their very life itself, for the cause of Christ? And how many who are in this service of God, are looked upon as "extreme", "fanatical", and not respected as defenders of the faith.

2) In Patriotism: We would proudly fly His banner.
The American flag is "in". War makes it that much more popular, to true patriots. Every where it's colors, and themes are displayed. From flags, to pictures, to t-shirts, to coffee mugs, to etc., etc., etc. We sing of it. We pledge to it. We salute it. Yea, we durst not let it touch the ground, in dishonor.
Yet, how many Christians are willing and enthusiastic to show the same loyalty to the Banner of the Lord Jesus Christ. I don't mean to a christian flag. I mean the themes of Christianity. I mean to be identified with Christ. I mean His attributes and identifying marks and fruits. His very name. How many times, we allow it to be dragged through the mud, left out in the rain to rot, or we fail to display His banner of truth, even when it's bright, pleasant and in season. It seems at times, we are even ashamed of it.

3) In Politics: We would support our own "party", and get actively involved in "grass roots" efforts.
Alas, the time and money and effort that is spent in public marches, writing letters, making phone calls, voicing our opinions and on and on. Not to mention unconditional loyalty to our particular "party" - No matter what!!!
If Christians would only put that much devotion, concern, loyalty and sincerity into the kingdom of God.

4) In tribute money: We would give what we owed.
I don't know too many people who "like" paying taxes. But we do it (partly because of the fear of repercussions) for the upkeep and maintenance of the Government. But, oh, how we rob God, and that without fear!!! We are sure to "render unto Caesar" what is his, but we forget to render "unto God, what is God's".

5) In the Law: We stand behind the "law of the land", no matter how unpleasant it may be (even the death penalty, and rules of war, etc.) We love justice and forget mercy.
And yet, when it comes to our personal lives, or matters in the church, we are far too lax with rules and commandments, for fear of being "legalists" (especially when God's laws are condemning us personally). Hypocrites, we are - and without even blushing about it!!!

6) In Media: We would listen to Christian talk radio, music, teaching and preaching. We'd read Christian newspapers, periodicals and literature.
Instead most of the christian's "leisure" time is spent with local papers, news blogs, political hype talk shows, and of course America's finest in culture and entertainment straight from the professionals in Hollywood, Nashville, and NYC!!!

7) In Time of Need: We depend on government to feed us when times get hard, pay us when we're out of work, and buy our car when it becomes a "clunker".
Do we ever exert the faith of a mustard seed, and just depend on God for our needs?

8) In Founding Documents: We uphold and rest under the shelter of the U.S.Constitution (one of the finest human documents ever written).
But Christian, do you not realize that you hold the greatest document ever given to the world, the Word of God. The constitution of His Kingdom. Would you defend it, memorize it, study it, distribute copies of it, honor it, and learn to claim all of it's benefits and promises?

9) In Leadership: We would take care of our leader.
The President of the U.S. has no living expenses, is cared for, protected, respected (whether liked or not), cheered for, celebrated, talked about daily..... What about our leader, Church? Who honors, defends, loves, longs for, the Bishop of our souls... Jesus Christ?

I am not against America. I do not hate her. I don't know where on Earth I'd rather live. But, I can't help but see more and more in the Bible, that we're "in the world" but not "of the world".
Why doesn't the Devil persecute the professing church in America today? He doesn't have to. They have everything they want - from both worlds.
I have heard men on radio and in pulpits blast believers for not getting involved in politics. Chapter and verse please? I would rather have a KJV bible thrown at me, than you're opinion!
The best thing I can do for my children's (and country's) future is live for God (the right way), proclaim the gospel, have the mind of Christ, show the love of Christ, and hopefully lead others to Jesus Christ!
The message of the New Testament isn't to love, defend, support, rely on, and honor your country! Rather, it is "seek ye first the kingdom of God and His righteousness"!!! His kingdom is withins us. Who is your loyalty to?

Imagine a life, if Christians treated Jesus, like they do their country.


"By faith he sojourned...as in a strange country...For he looked for a city which hath foundations, whose builder and maker is God... and confessed that they were strangers and pilgrims on the earth. For they that say such things declare plainly that they seek a country. And truly, if they had been mindful of that country from whence they came out, they might have had opportunity to have returned. But now they desire a better country, that is, an heavenly: wherefore God is not ashamed to be called their God: for he hath prepared for them a city." (Hebrews 11: 9,10,13-16)

Bro. Josh



Tuesday, November 17, 2009

Freedom Of Choice

"For, brethren, ye have been called unto liberty; only use not liberty for an occasion to the flesh, but by love serve one another." (Galatians 5:13)

"But whoso looketh into the perfect law of liberty, and continueth therein, he being not a forgetful hearer, but a doer of the work, this man shall be blessed in his deed. (James 1:25)

The simple fact of the matter is, men have a God given right to think or believe however they choose to.
This doesn't mean of course, that everyone's way of thinking is right. (In fact, man heart being deceitfully wicked, and his understanding darkened, usually comes to the wrong conclusion, apart from God's wisdom.) Nor does it mean that absolute truth doesn't exist. But simply that God doesn't force His way on any person, and no man has the right to either.

Jesus told His disciples that if the people wouldn't hear in one city, to go to the next. The Bible also says that "some believe, some don't", yet this doesn't change the truth or power of God's Word. (Please see Romans 3:3-4)

Although God never forced Himself on anyone, sadly the "professing" church has tried to, down through the years. Other non-christian religions have as well. However true, Bible believing, New Testament Christians, have always held to "individual soul liberty". This is one of the distinctives of the Baptist way of thinking. I don't know if the idea of "individual soul liberty" has always been adhered to by every person everywhere who claimed to be a Baptist, but typically down through the years, Baptists (and their predecessors, of a Baptistic like faith) have been the persecuted, and not the persecutors. Even "Protestant" groups who were so severely persecuted by the Roman Catholic Church, turned and persecuted the Anabaptists, and refused to them the same liberty that they themselves were looking for.

One thing that always strikes me as odd, in this day when "tolerance" (or individual liberty) is so loudly proclaimed by the world and even churches, is that everyone and every way of thinking is expected to be tolerated - except for Bible believing Christians!

But even Baptists, as well as other Christians, have their thinking clouded on this issue today- especially when it comes to their ideas for the public school system, the government, etc...

Now, I believe strongly that we should be willing to stand for and try to persuade others to Biblical truth. As I told a man once, "If I believe that what I believe is right, why shouldn't I want everyone else to believe it?"
And of course, the idea of individual liberty doesn't mean that we shouldn't rightly divide, judge, mark, or even practice separation from those people and systems that are in error.

"But take heed lest by any means this liberty of yours become a stumblingblock to them that are weak" (1Corinthians 8:9)

"As free, and not using your liberty for a cloke of maliciousness, but as the servants of God." (1Peter 2:16)

I hope to expand upon this post later on.
Until then, have a look at another post which shows a real life application of the idea of this freedom of choice, concerning the life of John Bunyan:

http://brotherjosh.blogspot.com/2009/11/trial-of-john-bunyan.html

Bro. Josh

The Trial Of John Bunyan

(copied)

The Breedlove Papers - John Bunyan's Trial

Thomas Breedlove was an English legal scribe whose job it was to record court proceedings. Breedlove passed from the scene around 1675 leaving nearly one-thousand verbatim accounts of primarily minor trials from the period of 1660 to 1675, this during the time of King Charles II.

What follows is the transcript of the trial of His Majesty, King Charles II, against John Bunyan, tinker and sometime preacher of a relatively new and strange--as well as illegal cult--known as Baptists.
(For purposes of readability, Breedlove's language and spelling has been modernized. The substance of the record remains unchanged, however, the necessity of copious footnotes to explain archaic language has been eliminated.)

PROCEEDINGS, being a true account of the trial of John Bunyan, Tinker, of Bedfordshire, His Lordship, Judge Wingate presiding at the Courthouse in Bedfordshire on October 3, in the Year of our Lord, 1660. The Accused is charged with willful and deliberate Violation of various and sundry Royal and Parliamentary Edicts. His Trial this Day, however, respects a single Charge: namely, Violation of the Conventicle Act, first proposed by Her Most High and Mighty Majesty, our Late Beloved Queen Elizabeth, and reinstated by His Beneficent Highness, King Charles II. All Parties being in Place, and the Witnesses having been sworn, the trial proceeds.
JUDGE WINGATE: Mr. Bunyan, you stand before this Court accused of persistent and willful transgression of the Conventicle Act, which prohibits all British subjects from absenting themselves from worship in the Church of England, and from conducting worship services apart from our Church. You come, presumably, with no legal training, and yet without counsel. I must warn you, sir, of the gravity of the charge, the harshness of the penalty, in the event of your conviction, and the foolhardiness of acting as your own counsel in so serious a matter. Are you cognizant of these facts, and do you understand the charge?
BUNYAN: I am, and I do, M'lord.
JUDGE WINGATE: In truth, I hope you do. Now, I hold in my hand the depositions of the witness against you. In each case, they have testified that, to their knowledge, you have never, in your adult life, attended services in the church of this parish. Each further testifies that he has observed you, on numerous occasions, conducting religious exercises in and near Bedford. These depositions have been read to you, have they not?
BUNYAN: They have, M'lord.
JUDGE WINGATE: In that case, then, this court would be profoundly interested in your response to them.
BUNYAN: Thank you M'lord. And may I say that I am grateful for the opportunity to respond. Firstly, the depositions speak the truth. I have never attended services in the Church of England, nor do I intend ever to do so. Secondly, it is no secret that I preach the word of God whenever, wherever, and to whomever He pleases to grant me opportunity to do so.
Having said that, M'lord, there is a weightier issue that I am constrained to address. I have no choice but to acknowledge my awareness of the law which I am accused of transgressing. Likewise, I have no choice but to confess my guilt in my transgression of it. As true as these things are, I must affirm that I neither regret breaking the law, nor repent of having broken it. Further, I must warn you that I have no intention in future of conforming to it. It is, on its face, an unjust law, a law against which honorable men cannot shrink from protesting. In truth, M'lord, it violates an infinitely higher law--the right of every man to seek God in his own way, unhindered by any temporal power. That, M'lord, is my response.
JUDGE WINGATE: This Court would remind you, sir, that we are not here to debate the merits of the law. We are here to determine it you are, in fact, guilty of violating it.
BUNYAN: Perhaps, M'lord, that is why YOU are here, but it is most certainly not why I am here. I am here because you compel me to be here. All I ask is to be left alone to preach and to teach as God directs me. As, however, I must be here, I cannot fail to use these circumstances as an opportunity to speak against what I know to be an unjust and odious edict.
JUDGE WINGATE: Let me understand you. You are arguing that every man has a right, given him by Almighty God, to seek the Deity in his own way, even, if he chooses, without benefit of the English Church?
BUNYAN: That is precisely what I am arguing, M'lord. Or without benefit of any church.
JUDGE WINGATE: Do you know what you are saying? What of Papists and Quakers? What of pagan Mohammedans? Have these the right to seek God in their own misguided way?
BUNYAN: Even these M'lord.
JUDGE WINGATE: May I ask if you are particularly sympathetic to the views of these or other such deviant religious societies?
BUNYAN: I am not, M'lord.
JUDGE WINGATE: Yet you affirm a God-given right to hold any alien religious doctrine that appeals to the warped minds of men?
BUNYAN: I do, M'lord.
JUDGE WINGATE: I find your views impossible of belief. And what of those who, if left to their own devices, would have no interest in things heavenly? Have they the right to be allowed to continue unmolested in their error?
BUNYAN: It is my fervent belief that they do, M'lord.
JUDGE WINGATE: And on what basis, might I ask, can you make such a rash affirmation?
BUNYAN: On the basis, M'lord, that a man's religious views--or lack of them--are matters between his conscience and his God, and are not the business of the Crown, the Parliament, or even, with all due respect, M'lord, of the Court.
However, much I may be in disagreement with another man's sincerely held religious beliefs, neither I nor any other may disallow his right to hold those beliefs. No man's rights in these affairs are secure if every other man's rights are not equally secure.
JUDGE WINGATE: It is obvious, sir, that you are a victim of deranged thinking. If my ears deceive me not, I must infer from your words that you believe the State to have no interest in the religious life of its subjects.
BUNYAN: The State, M'lord, may have an interest in anything in which it wishes to have an interest. But the State has no right whatever to interfere in the religious life of its citizens.
JUDGE WINGATE: You are a tinker by trade, are you not, Mr. Bunyan?
BUNYAN: That is correct, M'lord.
JUDGE WINGATE: Would you mind apprising this Court of the extent of your formal schooling?
BUNYAN: Not at all, M'lord. Able I am to read and write, and that with difficulty.
JUDGE WINGATE: I surmised as much. I think I perceive why you are unable to appreciate the disaster that would accompany your views should ever they hold sway in our society. I myself--and I say this in all modesty--am not inconsiderably trained in the historian's discipline. If you were half so well-versed yourself, you would instantly recognize the fatal flaw in your reasoning. Throughout history, virtually every significant human tragedy has come about as a result of divergent religious views. Nation against nation. Brother against brother. War. Destruction. Devastation. Time and time again. And why? I shall tell your why, sir. It is because men cannot agree on which God to worship, and how to worship Him
Now, after a long and arduous struggle, we have succeeded in forging a conformity in the religious beliefs of all Englishmen. All our problems will be resolved when everyone finally agrees to accommodate himself, and adopt the same orthodoxy of religious opinion. No more religious wars! No more divisive doctrinal disputes! Think of it, Mr. Bunyan! Does this not portend a society of which any man would be proud and happy to be a part?
BUNYAN: To a degree, M'lord, it admittedly does. But only if everyone can be convicted by virtue of reasoning alone to adopt identical views of God. The society that you describe is an appealing one, but I fear the cost is far too high. It would necessitate that honest men repudiate convictions honestly held.
JUDGE WINGATE: You are, Mr. Bunyan, a strong-willed and opinionated man.
Yet, this Court finds it fascinating to speak with you, and wishes, time permitted, further discussion of our respective philosophies. But, alas, time is passing swiftly, and other cases await our attention. Let us move, then, to the matter before us, shall we? The evidence I hold in my hand--even apart from your own admission of guilt--is sufficient to convict you, and the Court is within its right to have you committed to prison for a considerably long time. I do not wish to send you to prison, Mr. Bunyan. I am aware of the poverty of your family, and I believe you have a little daughter who, unfortunately, was born blind. Is this not so?
BUNYAN: It is, M'lord.
JUDGE WINGATE: Very well. The decision of the Court is this: Inasmuch as the accused has confessed his guilt, we shall follow a merciful and compassionate course of action. We shall release him on the condition that he swear solemnly to discontinue the convening of religious meetings, and that he affix his signature to such an oath prior to quitting the Courtroom. That will be all, Mr. Bunyan. I hope not to see you here again. May we hear the next case?
BUNYAN: M'lord, if I may have another moment of the Court's time?
JUDGE WINGATE: Yes, but you must be quick about it. We have other matters to attend to. What is it?
BUNYAN: I cannot do what you ask of me, M'lord. I cannot place my signature upon any document in which I promise henceforth not to preach. My calling to preach the Gospel is from God, and He alone can make me discontinue what He has appointed me to do. As I have had no word from Him to that effect, I must continue to preach, and I shall continue to preach.
JUDGE WINGATE: Mr. Bunyan, you are trying the patience of this Court.
BUNYAN: That is not my intention, M'lord.
JUDGE WINGATE: I warn you, sir, the Court has gone the second mile to be lenient with you, out of concern for your family's difficult straits. Truth to tell, it would appear that the Court's concern for your family far exceeds your own. Do you wish to go to prison?
BUNYAN: No, M'lord. Few things there are that I would wish less.
JUDGE WINGATE: Very well, then, Mr. Bunyan. This Court will make one further attempt in good faith to accommodate what appears to be strongly held convictions on your part. In his compassion and beneficence, our Sovereign, Charles II, has made provision for dissenting preachers to hold some limited meetings. All that is required is that such ministers procure licenses authorizing them to convene these gatherings. The Court will not require you to sign any documents, but will require on your verbal commitment to proceed through proper channels to obtain licenses. You will not find the procedure burdensome, and even you, Mr. Bunyan, must surely grant the legitimacy of the State's interest in ensuring that any fool with a Bible does not simply gather a group to people together and begin to preach to them. Imagine the implications were that to happen! Can you comply with this condition, Mr. Bunyan? Before you answer, mark you this: should you refuse, the Court will have no alternative but to sentence you to a prison term. Think, sir, of your poor wife. Think of your flock, who can hear you to their hearts' content when you shall have secured your licenses. Think on these things, and give us your answer, sir!
BUNYAN: M'lord, I appreciate the Court's efforts to be--as you have put it--accommodating. But again, I must refuse your terms. I must repeat that it is God who constrains me to preach, and no man or company of men may grant or deny me leave to preach. These licenses of which you speak, M'lord, are symbols not of a right, but of a privilege. Implied therein is the principle that a mere man can extend or withhold them according to his whim. I speak not of privileges, but of rights. Privileges granted by men may be denied by men. Rights are granted by God, and can be legitimately denied by no man. I must, therefore, refuse to comply.
JUDGE WINGATE: Very well, Mr. Bunyan. Since you persist in your intractability, and since you reject this Court's honest effort at compromise, you leave us no choice but to commit you to Bedford jail for a period of six years. If you manage to survive, I should think that your experience will correct your thinking. If you fail to survive, that will be unfortunate. In any event, I strongly suspect that we have heard the last we shall ever hear from Mr. John Bunyan. Now, may we hear the next case.
(While in prison, John Bunyan produced one of the most marvelous of all Christian works: Pilgrim's Progress.)

The Fundamental Top 500